Validation and Review

All programmes offered by the University have gone through a process of  validation before being offered to students as a programme of study. Validation is the process of initial approval, development and consideration for any new programme.

In addition, programmes are reviewed when necessary to make sure that they remain current and relevant. For programmes offered by our collaborative partners this involves a formal process of Revalidation - the process of re-approval, re-development and consideration for any existing programme offered at a partner institute.

Why is it necessary to carry out a validation of a programme?

It is necessary to formally validate our programmes of study (i) to be sure that the standards of the awards given by the University of Hertfordshire are in line with sector expectations as articulated in the QAA  UK Quality Code for Higher Education; and (ii) to ensure currency of content, programme coherency and educational challenge; and (iii) appropriate student support, learning, teaching and assessment strategies that together result in an excellent student experience.

To achieve the above, the University must be satisfied that the proposed programme:

  • Reflects Subject Benchmark statements and/or relevant Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body (PSRB) requirements;
  • Satisfies the Frameworks for Higher Education Qualifications
  • Is appropriate in the light of student demand, employer expectations and employment opportunities;
  • Reflects the University’s  academic drivers and initiatives;
  • Is sufficiently resourced in terms of both the availability of staff and physical resources;
  • Reflects current research and practice in the application of knowledge in the relevant discipline(s), technological advances, and developments in learning and teaching.

Why do we revalidate our collaborative programmes?

The process of revalidation enables the University to ensure that the portfolio of study remains relevant to both the School and to our prospective students at our collaborative partners, that the curriculum content is appropriate, and that learning and teaching is up-to-date and well-resourced. This process also ensures that our internal requirements are met, for example, University strategic policies and Academic Quality regulations, as well as all external requirements, such as the Frameworks for Higher Education Qualifications of UK Degree-Awarding Bodies (2024),  the OfS conditions of registration, QAA Subject benchmark statements and any relevant professional and statutory regulatory body standards requirements. Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) regulations are also considered during the development of programmes.

All academic programmes offered by our collaborative partners are required to undergo revalidation no longer than every six years.

Review of programmes offered at the University of Hertfordshire

Home programmes gain continuous approval upon validation and will make any necessary changes through ‘minor’ and ‘significant’ change processes. Where necessary, major changes to a programme can be made through a 'major' review process.

The processes for approving these revisions are based on the scale of revision required, as outlined  here:

Depending on the scale of the changes required, there are different processes, as set out here:

Approval process for minor changes

Approval process for significant changes

Major review process

An overview of these process can also be found in this document:

At a glance - approval processes for programme changes (PDF - 0.17 Mb)

Additional intakes

The process  for approving additional intakes  differs from the processes described in (a)-(c) and can be found here:

Approval process for additional intakes

Deadlines

All programmes undergoing validation, re-validation or major review have to be ratified by the Academic Board before they can be delivered. Staff can find the relevant deadlines here:

Validation and  Review deadlines

Any exceptions to these deadlines must be agreed with the Director of Academic Quality Assurance. An extension to the deadline may be granted in certain exceptional circumstances, set out in the paper 'Requests for Extensions to Validation and Review Deadlines', available to University staff. If you require an extension to a validation or review event, then you will need to inform and seek advice from the relevant Associate Director of Academic Quality.  You must complete the Validation and Review extension form and send it to your Schools Academic Services Officer (Academic Quality Assurance) for permission to be sought from the Director.

The processes of validation, revalidation and major review

The Academic Quality team in the Centre  manages all validation, revalidation and major review activity at the University and oversees the 'significant' change process, liaising closely with Schools and programme teams during the process. Schools will be aware of which programmes are due for major review or revalidation in the current academic year. The Academic Quality team also offers a workshop for leading a Programme Development or Major Review, as well as various other relevant workshops, which can be booked via the Staff Core portal.

CAQA Workshops

The processes for validation and review activity are detailed in the UPR AS17 Section B: Development and approval procedures for new programmes of study. The process involves a number of steps. Detailed information on how to undertake a validation, revalidation or major review can be found in the relevant handbook.